This
is the first occasion that a Joint Session of the Senate and House
of Representatives has ever been held to pay tribute to one of our
own.
Who
better to establish this precedent than the Most Hon. Hugh Lawson
Shearer who, in over half a century of public life, has served the
people of Jamaica as labour leader par excellence, councillor, member
of Parliament, Cabinet Minister and Prime Minister.
Since
his passing, the many tributes from his colleagues, constituents,
and a wide cross section of the Jamaican people have served to convey
the true measure of the man, the height of his ideals, the breadth
of his sympathy, the depth of his convictions and the length of
his patience. In addition to these well-deserved encomiums, this
supreme legislative body of our land has the responsibility to record
for posterity, our appreciation of a colleague, a friend, an elder
statesman and, above all, a fine human being.
May I remind this distinguished Chamber that this is not the first
occasion on which the members of the Legislature have honoured this
deserving son of Jamaica for his contribution to the nation. On
May 15, 2001 at a special sitting of the House of Representative
we paid tribute to him at the end of his illustrious career.
My
task today is not to catalogue in detail the impressive list of
accomplishment in his years of service, others have done so and
many more will. Indeed the Government of Jamaica commissioned a
biography which happily was completed prior to his passing and which
met with his enthusiastic approval. I wish to indicate just a few
of the unique aspects of his life which illustrate the characteristics
that made him the exceptional individual that he was.
As
we look back at our nation’s history we recognise that the
failure of British colonial policy created the conditions that made
1938 inevitable. In three weeks of militant action, the working
people brought the colonial administration to its knees and created
the institutions which laid the foundations of modern Jamaica. History
records the dominating presence of National Heroes Sir Alexander
Bustamante and Norman Washington Manley.
Only
the most discerning contemporary observers, would have taken notice
of a seventeen-year old graduate of St. Simon’s College who,
on his own initiative, went to Lynden Newland, a senior officer
with the Bustamante Industrial Trade Union (BITU) and editor of
the union’s newspaper the Jamaica Worker, to offer his services.
Newland,
recognising talent, immediately invited the young man to join the
staff of the BITU and assist him in producing the newspaper. Such
were the circumstances in which Hugh Lawson Shearer began a half-century
of public service.
This
ambitious and focused young man was the product of a humble home
in rural Jamaica. In an era when home, school and church worked
in close partnership to inculcate the positive values and attitudes
associated with the best of rural life – honesty, integrity
and industry Hugh Shearer learnt these lessons well.
The
Jamaica in which Shearer served his apprenticeship in the union
movement was predominantly rural and poor. A commitment to raise
living standards of workers could only mean long hours of explaining
and winning consensus, facing the hostility of the employer class
and the wrath of the colonial authorities.
The
apprenticeship provided him with invaluable insights into the strengths
and weaknesses of the people whom he would seek to represent, as
well as with the oligarchy with which he would have to contend.
He
learnt fast and he learnt well. The evidence was in the increasing
responsibilities assigned to him by the “Chief”- Alexander
Bustamante - whose tutelage prepared him for his role in transforming
the Jamaican union landscape and the practice of industrial relations
with his friend and rival, Michael Norman Manley.
It
was their advocacy and negotiating skills that raised the status
of the trade unions to that of the third point in the triangle of
governance – the public sector, the private sector and the
trade unions.
The
enormous benefits he won for unionised workers are well documented.
What needs to be given equal prominence is his insistence on discipline
and integrity at the work place, making sure that workers honoured
agreements negotiated with their employers.
He himself provided a shining example of this integrity and discipline
he sought to inculcate as every employer knew that Hugh Shearer
did not have to sign a written agreement. A handshake was enough.
His word was his bond.
Shearer over the years had been an influential voice in the Executive
of the Jamaica Labour Party (JLP) the affiliate of the BITU which
he led following Bustamante’s full involvement in government.
But he was a reluctant participant in representational politics.
Yet when in 1955 his party asked him to contest one of the most
challenging seats in the Corporate Area – Western Kingston
– he did not hesitate in coming to the wicket. Just over a
decade later, at age 44, he became Jamaica’s youngest Prime
Minister, having by then successfully pursued his electoral fortunes
in South East Clarendon during the General Elections of 1967.
As
Prime Minister, he presided over a period of exceptional growth
in the Jamaican economy fuelled by major investments in bauxite
and alumina as well as the tourism sector. The Act to create the
National Insurance Scheme was one of the finest pieces of labour
legislation ever to have come to this Honourable House and the programme
since its inception has brought monumental benefits to the workers
of Jamaica.
It
was during his tenure that the award of Jamaican National Honours
was initiated to replace previous British National Honours, which
he referred to as an anachronism, commenting that he could not see
how, at a time when there was no longer a British Empire, Jamaicans
could be receiving such awards as “Knights of the British
Empire and “Members of the British Empire”.
The
firm proposal for a Caribbean Court as the final Appellate Body
was conceived at a meeting of regional heads over which he presided
in 1970.
As a Senator, he was Jamaica’s first voice in the international
arena after independence when he was selected to deliver Jamaica’s
policy addresses at the United Nations General Assembly. It was
there he proposed that the world should identify an International
Year for Human Rights. This was accepted, and the year 1968 so designated
In every international forum he was uncompromising in his objection
to apartheid. He mobilised support to fight this evil and inhumane
system of racial injustice at the level of the Commonwealth, regionally
in the Caribbean, and at the United Nations.
His
consummate negotiating skills, honed in the trenches from the earliest
days of his involvement in the union movement, of stood him in good
stead as he led Jamaica’s international trade negotiations
and when he returned to the Foreign Ministry during the 80’s.
He soon won and retained to the end the esteem and regard of his
foreign counterparts, being chosen as Chairman of the ACP group
at critical stages of negotiations with Europe.
In
this House, he was a formidable Debater. Not for him the flights
of oratorical fancy, but grounded in the force of his convictions
and his capacity of persuasive eloquence, his presentations always
commanded deserving attention and due respect. He was at his most
passionate when pleading the cause of the poor, and the disadvantaged.
He
was a convincing advocate for all those who contributed to the service
of Parliament – Clerks, Orderlies, Hansard Writers, and Drivers
to Parliamentarians. He could change periods of legislative tensions
into resounding peals of laughter by his timely humour and infectious
smile. He was resolute and yet always gracious. He had no grudge
to anyone and in return he earned the respect and admiration of
all who served with him, on both sides of the aisle.
Throughout
his entire career whether he worked on the stage of the union movement
or in the corridors of political power he employed his considerable
oratorical skills and persuasive powers in the cause of the rights
of workers – a mission that was central to his life. However
strong his views on any issue he had a gift for approaching every
discussion or negotiation, however contentious, with an admirable
level of courtesy, respect and camaraderie on both sides of the
negotiating table and of the political fence. It is indisputable
that he recognised that whatever our political views we were all
united by a genuine wish to improve the quality of life of the Jamaican
people.
Like all good leaders, he invested considerable time in nurturing
the
next generation and many of the current leaders in the trade union
movement are the beneficiaries of his mentorship.
It
was no surprise to those of us who knew him well – as a man
full of generosity of spirit and of time - that he ended as he began
with a voluntary commitment in his later years to the welfare of
a segment of the population - the elderly - whose cause he championed
with characteristic dedication, care and concern.
As
the nation prepares to pay its final respects to this man among
men, we remember the words from Proverbs: “Good men must die,
but death cannot kill their names.” |